Digital Identity Management
Scott C. Lemon, Exploring Identity in the Internet Age





Blogroll










My other blogs ...




Subscribe to "Digital Identity Management" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

 

Tuesday, November 23, 2004
 

This is my second Axiom of Identity, which builds upon the first. I swear that if you grok these, you'll see the model that I am creating that allows for the creation of powerful identity management solutions. I believe that it is important to remember that we are living in a world with so much identity around us, that we fail to realize where it all came from. On to Axiom #2:
I posit that identity does not exist outside the context of a community.
Once again, it is easy to fall into the trap of believing that I have inherent identity, and that it is mine. However The First Axiom of Identity builds the foundation that all of my identity is given to me by others. If this is the case, then that identity can only exist, and be understood, by the community that gave me that identity, or other communities that are related.

The root of the Second Axiom is that identity is built upon language and communications. Since attributes of identity are descriptive in nature, they are dependant upon accurate and consistent definitions of those attributes. It is often difficult to see this clearly since much of what we are looking at with identity was learned when we were children. Some of our attributes are so commonly understood within our communities, that we fail to see them distinctly.

For example, we all know what height, weight, age, hair color, and shoe size are. What we forget is that there are still communities on earth that would not understand our measurements of these attributes ... let alone the name of the attribute! We can assume that almost any culture on earth has the concept of weight, and has some word they assign to it. We can not assume that they measure their concept of weight in a unit of measurement that we would understand. I happen to be well versed in 'pounds' since I was raised in the United States. In the UK someone might actually still give me their weight in 'stone'.

Although there is considerable efforts in global standards, these standards are only beginning to scratch the surface of a common language for identity attributes, and a common set of metrics for these attributes. Until the standards grow to encompass all of identity (yeah ... and when will that be?) we have to understand that identity attributes must be related to a community, and the standard by which it is measured.

So where does this fit in the software realm? It simply means that as we create a 'schema' for identity, we have to keep track of the 'context' of that information. Two core pieces of information that we have to track when creating an identity management solution include "Who is the definitive source of that identity attribute?", and "Who is the authority on the metrics of that identity attribute?" These might be different, or the same, communities. Using the example of weight, the definitive source of the information could be my home scale, a doctor, or a hospital that I visited. The metric of 'pounds' in the United States, however, is governed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Again, the importance of this is when a person or company wants my identity, they also will want to ensure they trust the definitive source, and the metrics that I provide. (I am sure that the new Virgin Galactic space flights are not going to trust my home scale as a definitive source of my weight!) Another example of this is that your bank, when you apply for a car loan, still wants to check with the definitive source of your employment information. And they are going to want to hear your salary in units of measurement that they know!

Some new issues arise as we dig deeper into this model. First, we have to be ready to resolve conflicts in naming of identity attributes. Second, we have to be ready to provide translations between units of measurement. Third, we have to have mechanisms to verify identity information with the definitive sources.

All of these are subjects that I'll touch on in other Axioms ...


3:20:27 PM      


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2005 Scott C. Lemon.
Last update: 6/14/2005; 1:19:41 PM.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves (blue) Manila theme.
November 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
Feb   Dec