Digital Identity Management
Scott C. Lemon, Exploring Identity in the Internet Age





Blogroll










My other blogs ...




Subscribe to "Digital Identity Management" in Radio UserLand.

Subscribe To This Site (RSS)
RSS Feed


Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

Wednesday, November 30, 2005
 

I just listened to a great podcast from ITConversations that was a presentation at Pop!Tech 2005.  It was a wonderful talk by Graham Flint about the Gigapxl Project.  This is some amazing work where they are now taking pictures at extreme resolutions - close to 4 Gigapixels!  That is close to 4000 Megapixels ... a LOT more than the digital cameras that you can buy today.  They are using some highly custom cameras to be able to take pictures with incredible resolutions, built out of old U2 spy plane parts.  These are still "film" cameras, but he also discusses the work on fully digital versions of these cameras being built.

In his talk he mentions some interesting things that they find when they are able to zoom in on these extremely detailed images.  He talks about this image of paragliders on the coast of California.  When his wife was reviewing the image, she found people watching with binoculars and telescopes ... but they were looking down ... not up!  When they followed the track of the people's vision, they found that below the paragliders was a nudist beach!  When they put this particular image in a museum, the resolution was so good that they had to mask the faces and heads of the nudists!  This opens a whole new conversation about privacy ... and continues to beg the question "Is there such thing as privacy?"

The site has got a lot of very cool images, and examples of the abilitty to zoom.  They even had a cityscape of my hometown of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

I'll have to check which podcast had the Q&A, however they did bring up the questions of privacy.  In this image of  PETCO Park he talks about the fact that they have detailed images of ~15,000 people ... and how would you ever get a release from all of these people?  As a friend and I talked about this, it means that a single photo of a demonstration or rally might give details images of the people attending.  Uh ... what are you doing in that hotel room on the 15th floor?

It is truly some amazing work, and the podcast was a great listen.  I've attached the link to this post ... we'll see if it works for you!


3:37:53 PM     

I love this article ... and I'm almost amused at the perspective presented in this article - Blogger Blocked at U.S. Border.  A Canadian citizen was blocked from coming into the U.S. from Toronto when U.S. border guards found references in his blog to being based in New York. The blogger seems to be surprised that someone would hold him accountable for what he wrote!

"One of them, a very sharp guy in fact, started to read every single post on my blog. And it didn't take long until he shocked me: 'So you live in New York, right? That's what you've written in your [blog].'"

Derakhshan did, in fact, write that he was based out of New York—mostly because it sounded "sexier" than saying he was based out of Toronto, he said.

But between his offhand blog comment and the fact that he was carrying a Newsweek magazine sent to him at a New York address, the guards found grounds to refuse his entry into the United States, for at least the next six months.

According to U.S. policy, as a Canadian citizen Derakhshan may be legally entitled to stay in the United States for up to six months.

Canadian citizens entering the United States as visitors for business do not require either a passport or a visa, although visitors are required to satisfy border guards of their citizenship, according to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's site.

"It was obvious the guy was trying to find an excuse not to let me in, and he found something," Derakhshan told Ziff Davis Internet News. "He found that I said in the blog that I said I'm based in New York now. He said being based in New York is illegal."

Uh ... excuse me, but it seems to me that Mr. Derakhshan made the choice to be irresponsible with his writing ... he publicly claimed to be in violation of the law.  The "sharp guy" realized that not only was this Canadian carrying a magazine with an address to him in the U.S., but he outright claimed to be "based" in New York ... in direct violation of the law!

So what is the big deal?  You got what you asked for.  You were more interested in "looking good" ("Derakhshan did, in fact, write that he was based out of New York—mostly because it sounded "sexier" than saying he was based out of Toronto, he said.") and are now surprised at the consequences of your actions and words.

It is always amazing to me when people want to act surprised when they get caught in their inauthenticities.  I remember being taught to be very careful what I say ... and to understand the consequences of telling lies.  It appears that either he really was based in New York illegally, or that his claims to look good have simply caught up with him.

In either case, I love the idea of the border guards using Google!



2:47:37 PM     


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2005 Scott C. Lemon.
Last update: 12/4/2005; 7:21:11 AM.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves (blue) Manila theme.
November 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
Oct   Dec